The Nobel Prize Legacy: An Anniversary Ponderance

Each year, December 10 marks the celebration of the esteemed Nobel Prize, established by the renowned Swedish chemist, engineer, and inventor Alfred Nobel.

Nobel believed people could improve society through science, knowledge, and humanism. In his final will, 1895, Nobel indicated that 94 per cent of his fortune should be used to create prizes for ‘those who, during the preceding year, shall have conferred the greatest benefit to humankind’. [1]

For several reasons, his decisions and the posthumous reading of his final will triggered a significant controversy in Sweden and internationally. In brief, these reasons included:

Nobel’s family opposed the establishment of the Nobel Prize and contested his will. The family only received half a per cent of his estate.
The press criticised the will as unpatriotic.
The awarders Nobel named refused to do what he requested in his will.
Authorities in various countries questioned the will.
There was no foundation for the money to go.
It was unclear where Nobel was domiciled when he died.
Nobel’s French property had to be relocated to Sweden.
The estate had to pay taxes.

Despite these challenges, the Nobel Foundation was created in 1900 to manage the Nobel Prize’s assets and oversee prize administration. Five years after Nobel’s death, the first Nobel Prize was awarded in 1901.

Initially, there were five categories and five committees: Physics, Chemistry, Physiology or Medicine, Literature, and Peace. In 1968, the Sveriges Riksbank (Sweden’s central bank) established the Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel. This addition brought the total number of prizes to six. [2]

Since 1901, the Nobel Prize has been awarded annually in Stockholm on 10 December, the anniversary of Nobel’s death. Each Nobel laureate receives a medal, diploma, and a monetary award.

Over the years, the accolade has recognised groundbreaking discoveries, literary masterpieces, and efforts to promote peace and human rights.

It has become a symbol of excellence in various fields and has significantly influenced scientific research, literature, and international relations.

The Selection Process: A Rigorous Endeavour

The prestige of the Nobel Prize is partly reflected in the meticulous selection process that precedes the announcement of each year’s laureates. The journey begins in the early autumn of the preceding year when the awarding institutions invite over 6,000 individuals to submit nominations for the various categories.

The nomination process is incredibly selective, with around 1,000 proposals per Prize. These nominations undergo a thorough evaluation by the respective committee, with experts consulted to determine the originality and importance of each nominee’s contributions. The recommendations are given to the awarding institutions, where the final decision is made by November 15.

Awarding institutions include:

The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences
The Nobel Assembly at Karolinska Institutet
The Swedish Academy
The Norwegian Nobel Committee

The deliberations and voting within these institutions are kept strictly confidential, ensuring the integrity and impartiality of the process. Although this level of secrecy naturally fuels speculation and debate, it underscores the Nobel Foundation’s commitment to maintaining the independence and objectivity of the awards.

The Developing Breadth of Boundaries

The Nobel Prizes have celebrated innovative discoveries throughout the years and mirrored the ever-evolving developments in the scientific and academic fields. Although the traditional categories endure, the choice of Nobel laureates frequently pushes the limits between disciplines, creating indistinct boundaries among established areas of study.

For example, the 2022 awards in Physics and Chemistry were given to pioneers in artificial intelligence (AI), signalling a significant shift in the perception and valuation of technology’s impact on scientific progress.

John Hopfield and Geoffrey Hinton won the Physics Prize for their contributions to artificial neural network development.
Demis Hassabis, John Jumper, and David Baker also won the Chemistry prize for using AI in protein structure prediction.

In 2024, Geoffrey Hinton (University of Toronto, Canada) won the award in physics for his pioneering work in AI, and David Baker (University of Washington, Seattle, USA) won the award for computational protein design in chemistry.

This cross-pollination of ideas and the acknowledgement of interdisciplinary collaborations have been hallmarks of the Nobel Prizes in recent years. The shift towards interdisciplinary partnerships has also had a ripple effect on the scientific community, encouraging researchers to venture beyond the confines of their traditional fields and seek new avenues for collaboration and innovation.

The Prizes have, in essence, become a catalyst for integrating diverse perspectives and exploring emerging frontiers in scientific research.

Navigating Ethical Considerations

As the Foundation and committees have adapted to changes in scientific exploration, they have had to confront the ethical implications of their choices. Acknowledging significant contributions in areas such as AI has sparked concerns regarding the responsible creation and use of these technologies.

Nobel laureates like Geoffrey Hinton, who co-developed the foundational techniques behind modern artificial neural networks, have been outspoken about the potential risks and challenges posed by the rapid advancement of AI. The Nobel Prize process has had to acknowledge these concerns, emphasising the need for the scientific community to exercise caution and prioritise the ethical implications of their work.

This heightened awareness of the societal impact of scientific discoveries has, in turn, influenced the peer review process and the broader scientific discourse. Researchers are increasingly expected to address the ethical considerations of their work, not only in their publications but also in the way they engage with the public and policymakers.

Ripple Effects: The Impact on Peer Review and Scientific Discourse

The Nobel Prize’s influence extends far beyond the recognition of individual achievements. The selection process and the prestige associated with the award have profoundly impacted the broader landscape of peer review and scientific discourse.

The rigorous evaluation undertaken has set a high bar for the standards of scientific excellence, shaping the priorities and expectations of the global research community. Researchers aspiring to achieve this level of recognition often align their work with the perceived priorities of the prizes, leading to a potential shift in the direction of scientific inquiry.

Moreover, the announcement of the Nobel laureates each year generates considerable media attention and public interest, further amplifying the impact of the awards. This heightened visibility can influence the funding and resources allocated to specific fields of study and the career trajectories of researchers, both established and emerging.

Additionally, the prestige of the Nobel Prize has also greatly affected the peer review process. Researchers are often eager to publish their work in journals and publications with a history of producing winning research, which inevitably provides further credibility and visibility. This dynamic has, in turn, led to an increased emphasis on the perceived impact and significance of the research rather than solely its methodological rigour or incremental contributions.

The Positive and Negative Effects

The Nobel Prize has had a significant influence on peer review in science, both positive and negative:

Status bias: A study found that a Nobel laureate is six times more likely to receive a positive review than a less well-known author. [3]
Double-blind review: The Prize’s influence has highlighted the importance of double-blind peer review to reduce bias. [4]
Particularism vs. universalism: The recommendation process shows evidence of particularism (bias based on personal or social factors) rather than pure universalism (evaluation based solely on scientific merit). [5]
Collaboration recognition: The limitation to three recipients has been criticised for not reflecting the collaborative nature of modern scientific research. [6]
Peer review scrutiny: The prestige of the Prize has intensified scrutiny of the scientific peer review process. It has sparked discussions about improving fairness and reducing bias in scientific evaluation.
Impact on scientific behaviour: The Prize’s influence may affect how scientists approach their work, potentially encouraging groundbreaking research and increasing competition.
Calls for reform: There are suggestions to modify the process and structure to better reflect collaborative science and reduce controversies. [7]

The Nobel Prize’s influence on peer review has been complex, highlighting both the strengths and weaknesses of the current scientific evaluation system. It has prompted ongoing discussions about improving fairness, reducing bias, and better recognising collaborative efforts in scientific achievements.

The Democratisation of Science: Is it enough?

The Nobel Prize aims to democratise science by challenging entrenched power structures and hierarchies in academic and research settings.

Historically, the Foundation and committees recognised contributions from individuals of various backgrounds, nationalities, and fields, amplifying the voices of underrepresented groups and questioning the influence of established institutions and research centres.

Furthermore, the Prizes have frequently highlighted research that contests the status quo or disrupts prevailing paradigms. This acknowledgement empowers researchers to explore unconventional inquiries, even amid scepticism from the broader scientific community.

But are their attempts enough?

Women have won about three per cent of all Prizes, with most of those in the peace and literature categories. The gender gap is especially large in chemistry, physics, and economics. [8]

As of November 2022, 17 people out of 954 Nobel laureates were Black, which is 1.7%. [9]

Women have been winning more prizes in recent years but still lag far behind men. For example, half of the prizes awarded to women have been since 2000, while men won 185 during that time.

The committees have made several efforts to increase diversity in the Nobel laureates, including:

Asking nominators to consider diversity. Since 2019, the Nobel committees have asked nominators to consider gender, ethnicity, geography, and topic. [10]
Inviting more people to nominate. The committees invite more people to nominate, including more women, younger scientists, and people from regions outside traditional academic hubs. [11]
Asking scientists to nominate more discoveries. The committees have asked scientists to nominate up to three discoveries instead of just one. [12]
Working with international scientific networks. The committees work with international scientific networks with access to a large and diverse pool of potential nominators. [13]

However, many of the diversity problems are systemic. They point to economic, schooling, and bias issues, as well as systemic racism and sexism within the education system.

Public Engagement

The Nobel Prizes have also significantly shaped public engagement with science and scientific research. The annual announcement of the laureates and the accompanying media coverage have helped raise awareness and interest in the latest advancements across various disciplines.

The Prizes have become a cultural phenomenon, captivating the public’s imagination and inspiring a sense of wonder and appreciation for the transformative power of scientific discovery. This heightened public engagement has, in turn, influenced the way researchers approach their work, encouraging them to communicate their findings in a more accessible and engaging manner.

The Nobel Prizes have also acted as a platform for scientists to share their knowledge and viewpoints with a wider audience. Laureates frequently participate in public lectures, media interviews, and outreach programmes, creating a bridge between the academic world and the daily experiences of people.

This boost in public involvement has significantly influenced the peer review process, as researchers are more often required to evaluate the societal relevance and consequences of their research. Ultimately, the Prizes have contributed to making science more accessible, enabling the public to connect with and comprehend the latest developments across various disciplines.

The Future of Nobel Prizes

As the world continues to grapple with complex global challenges, the role of the Nobel Prizes in shaping the future of scientific research and innovation becomes increasingly crucial.

The committees will undoubtedly continue to adapt the awards to reflect the challenges and changes of scientific inquiry, ensuring that the prizes remain relevant and responsive to humanity’s changing needs. This may involve the recognition of new fields of study, the incorporation of more diverse perspectives, and the continued emphasis on the ethical implications of scientific discoveries.

Moreover, the Nobel Prizes will likely play an even more prominent role in fostering interdisciplinary collaboration and the integration of diverse knowledge systems. As the boundaries between academic disciplines continue to blur, the committees will be challenged to recognise and celebrate the contributions of researchers who transcend these traditional divides.

The Nobel Prize remains one of the most coveted awards globally, representing the pinnacle of achievement in its respective fields. Its history reflects not only the progress of human knowledge and endeavour but also the changing priorities and values of the international community over more than a century.

Our team shares over 50 years of combined experience, providing a wealth of knowledge and know-how.

At PA EDitorial, we specialise in peer review and editorial management. Our main focus is supporting all journal contributors and their editorial boards throughout the peer review process. Moreover, we are known for our expertise in improving peer review administration. We also take pride in assisting problematic journals until they are returned to a healthy state.

PA EDitorial also offers copyediting, proofreading, academic and teaching material formatting, and journal social media services.

If you would like to know more about PA EDitorial, please feel free to contact us at info@paeditorial.co.uk.